Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-19 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Sonic silver |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 5S has an overall score of 76.2, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A10's 72.3 general score. These phones use Android operating system, but nubia Red Magic 5S has an older 10 version while Galaxy A10 has Android 11 version. Nubia Red Magic 5S's body is newer than Galaxy A10's, but it is somewhat thicker and much heavier.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a brighter screen than Galaxy A10, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2340px resolution, a bit bigger screen and a greater pixels amount per inch in the display. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a quite better performance than Galaxy A10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has just a bit bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A10, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a much higher resolution camera, a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited situations, a much higher video resolution and a much larger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features superior battery performance than Galaxy A10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although nubia Red Magic 5S is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A10. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy nubia Red Magic 5S, else you can save some money and get the Galaxy A10, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.