Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is much better than the Galaxy A10, getting a general score of 83.8 against 72.3. Galaxy A50's body is a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Galaxy A10, even though they were only released 0 months apart. The Galaxy A50 counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A10, because it has a quite bigger screen, a higher display density and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A10, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A50 has a superior camera than Galaxy A10, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A50 also has a lot more MP back-facing camera, a bigger aperture for better photos in low light environments and a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A50 has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A10, and although they both have a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A50 also has more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has superior battery life than Galaxy A10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A50 costs more than the Galaxy A10, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.