Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-03-19 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the Galaxy A10, having a score of 91.3 against 72.3. Both devices in this review come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version and Galaxy A10 has Android 11, giving you some additional features. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a extremely newer phone than the Galaxy A10, but it's heavier and just a little bit thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A10, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A52 5G has a much better looking display than Galaxy A10, because it has a quite bigger display, more pixels per inch in the display and a way better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Galaxy A52 5G features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has better battery performance than Galaxy A10, because it has a 32% larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy A52 5G takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A10, because it has a way larger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photos, a way more mega-pixels back camera, a bigger camera aperture to take better photography in poorly lited situations and a lot higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.