Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-19 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A10, having a 76.9 score against 72.3. The Galaxy A70 construction has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A10, but it's a little heavier. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A70 has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A10 has Android 11 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a better screen pixels density, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit bigger display. Samsung Galaxy A70 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A70 features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A10, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A70 counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy A10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A10 shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and washed colors and a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light captures and video, they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate.
Although Galaxy A70 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A10. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy A10, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.