Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-19 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 151.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is way better than the Galaxy A10, getting a overall score of 97.6 against 72.3. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy A10 has Android 11 version, so it counts with some extra features and optimized performance. Galaxy Fold's design is noticeably heavier but thinner than the Galaxy A10, and both of them were only released with a couple of months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a quite superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy A10, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has 10 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Fold has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a higher pixels quantity in each inch in the display, a lot higher 1536 x 2152 resolution and a larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Fold captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy A10, because although it has a less MP back camera, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a way bigger aperture and a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a 4380mAh battery size instead of 3400mAh.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A10. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Galaxy A10, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.