Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-03-19 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 151.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M20 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A10, getting a 78.9 score against 72.3. Despite being the best we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy M20 construction is thicker and just a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A10. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy M20 has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A10 has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy M20 has a better screen than Galaxy A10, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a lot higher count of pixels per inch of display and a bit larger screen. The Galaxy M20 counts with more storage for games and applications than Galaxy A10, and although they both have an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy M20 also has more internal storage.
The Galaxy M20 has a bit superior processor than Galaxy A10, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy M20 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy M20's camera is just as good as the camera in Samsung Galaxy A10, both have the same diafragm aperture, a same size sensor, the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same (Full HD) video quality and the same resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy M20 features a very superior battery life than Galaxy A10, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.