Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a lot better than the Galaxy A10, having a overall score of 90.8 against 72.3. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 design is newer than Galaxy A10's, but it is a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A10, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a little larger display, a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a greater pixel quantity in each inch of display. Galaxy Note 20 features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a back-facing camera with less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better captures in poorly lited situations, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a lot bigger sensor taking way higher quality pictures.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has slightly more memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Note 20 counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a 26% bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A10. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A10, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.