Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-19 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A10's overall score of 72.3. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A10 has Android 11. Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is newer than Samsung Galaxy A10, it's a bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a bit larger screen, a lot greater pixel density and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3088. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better processor than Samsung Galaxy A10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures greater videos and photos than Galaxy A10, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a lot bigger sensor providing a much better image quality, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a much better 108 MP resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has improved battery duration than Galaxy A10, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A10. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, otherwise you can save some money and get the Galaxy A10, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.