Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A10, with an 80.4 score against 72.3. Galaxy Note Fan Edition's body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A10, but it is just a bit lighter. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a more vivid display than Galaxy A10, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per inch in the display and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A10, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A10, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A10, because although it has a lesser mega pixels back camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better photos in low light environments, a larger sensor taking better quality videos and photos and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Galaxy A10 features a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A10. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Galaxy A10, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.