Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is way better than Galaxy A10, with a score of 89 against 72.3. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a just a little lighter device than Galaxy A10, but they have the same thickness. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a way better 1080 x 2280px resolution, more pixels per screen inch and a bit larger display.
Galaxy Note10 has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy Note10 features a greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A10, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has 6 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A10, because it has a 3% bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy Note10 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way larger camera aperture for better low-light images and videos.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A10. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Note10, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Galaxy A10, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.