Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-03-19 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note3 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A10, having a 77.7 score against 72.3. Galaxy Note3's design weights the same than the Samsung Galaxy A10, but it is just a bit thicker. These devices use Android OS, but the Galaxy Note3 has 4.4.2 version and Samsung Galaxy A10 has Android 11.
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 features a bit better display than Galaxy A10, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a better number of pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy A10 has just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note3, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A10, because although it has lesser cpu cores (although they are faster), it also counts with more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note3 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A10, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting images or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have a 13 MP resolution camera in the back, the Samsung Galaxy Note3 also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video definition and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy A10 has just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 3400mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.