Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note4 has a score of 77.6, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A10's 72.3 general score. Even being the best in our current comparison, Galaxy Note4's design is noticeably older, just a little heavier and just a bit thicker than Galaxy A10. The Galaxy Note4 counts with a better display than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a lot higher screen density.
The Galaxy Note4 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note4 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note4 has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photos, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way better video definition and a back-facing camera with more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A10 counts with a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A10 also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A10 features a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity against 3220mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.