Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-19 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy A10, having a 93.6 score against 72.3. These devices come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should provide the user the same OS features. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A10, but it's heavier.
The Galaxy S10 5G features a superior hardware performance than Galaxy A10, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3040px, a lot greater display pixels density and a bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G takes better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a way bigger camera aperture, a way better video definition and a larger sensor taking higher quality photographs.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A10, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.