Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-19 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is much better than Galaxy A10's global score of 72.3. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is newer than the Galaxy A10's, although it is somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version while Galaxy A10 has Android 11.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A10, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a little bigger screen and a lot better display density. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy A10, because it has a lot higher video definition, a way more megapixels camera, a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a bigger camera aperture.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A10. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A10, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.