Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-03-19 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is a lot better than Galaxy A10's 72.3 overall score. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and Galaxy A10 has Android 11. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is incredibly newer than the Galaxy A10's, but it is somewhat thicker and notably heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 6 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better looking display than Galaxy A10, because it has a lot higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bit larger screen and a much better pixels amount per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a very superior camera than Galaxy A10, because it has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a larger camera aperture, a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a much better 7680x4320 video quality. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A10, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A10. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A10, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.