Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 Active is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A10, getting a 75.8 score against 72.3. The Galaxy S7 Active design is way older, just a little bit heavier and a lot thicker than Samsung Galaxy A10. Galaxy S7 Active features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A10, because although it has 4 less CPU cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per inch of screen and a much higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. Galaxy A10 has more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have equal 32 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A10 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy S7 Active takes clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a back camera with a lower 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much better (4K) video quality and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light images. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S7 Active is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A10. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy A10, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.