Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-19 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A10's overall score of 72.3. Both phones in our current comparison come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both of them should provide very similar operating system features. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro body is newer, but incredibly thicker and much heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A10.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a brighter display than Galaxy A10, because it has a little larger screen, way more pixels per inch in the screen and a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A10, and although they both have an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has 64 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A10, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy XCover Pro takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A10, because although it has a much tinier camera sensor capturing lot worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better images in low light situations and a way better resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy XCover Pro features greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A10. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Galaxy A10, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.