Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-19 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 151.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy A10's global score of 72.3. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version while Samsung Galaxy A10 has Android 11 version, so it offers some extra features and performance tweaks. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy A10, it's just a bit thinner and newer.
Galaxy Z Flip has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a quite larger display, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a way greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a quite better processing power than Galaxy A10, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip takes better photos and videos than Galaxy A10, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor, a larger camera aperture and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A10 has a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A10. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Galaxy A10, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.