Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-19 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 151.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A10's general score of 72.3. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's construction is newer and just a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A10's, but it is also a little heavier. These devices use the same Android 11 operating system, so they should offer all the same OS features.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, much more pixels per inch of display and a little bigger display.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A10, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser mega pixels, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low light images and video, a larger sensor and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A10 has just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 3 percent larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A10, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.