Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-19 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is way better than the Galaxy A10's 72.3 overall score. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is heavier than the Galaxy A10, it's thinner and newer. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a much better resolution of 1768 x 2208px and a bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a camera in the back with a lower resolution, it also counts with a much higher video quality, a much bigger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a larger aperture.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A10, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has greater battery duration than Galaxy A10, because it has a 32 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A10. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Galaxy A10, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.