Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZs is slightly better than the Galaxy A10, with a 77.2 score against 72.3. Despite of the fact the Xperia XZs is older and a bit thicker than the Galaxy A10, it's design is still a bit lighter. The Sony Xperia XZs counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy A10, because although it has 4 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with more RAM memory.
Xperia XZs features a much better looking display than Galaxy A10, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher screen pixel density and a higher 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution. The Galaxy A10 features a greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia XZs, and although they both have equal 32 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A10 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Xperia XZs features a much better camera than Galaxy A10, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photography, it also counts with a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back camera with lot more megapixels and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A10 features just a little better battery life than Xperia XZs, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity.
Although Xperia XZs is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A10. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Xperia XZs, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A10, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.