Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-19 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is better than Samsung Galaxy A10, getting an 82.7 score against 72.3. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A10 has Android 11. Even though Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is better than Samsung Galaxy A10, it must be told that it's also somewhat thicker and heavier.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A10, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a better display than Galaxy A10, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a better pixel quantity in each inch in the display and a quite larger display.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a back-facing camera with much more MP, a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a larger aperture to capture better images in poorly lited situations.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a little bit more storage for applications and games than Galaxy A10, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy A10, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.