Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue and Green |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| $ 151.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is better than the Galaxy A10, with an 83.8 score against 72.3. Even being the best we compare here, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 construction is a little bit thicker and notably heavier than Galaxy A10. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a superior processing unit than Galaxy A10, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a better looking display than Galaxy A10, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution, a bit larger display and more pixels per inch of screen. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A10, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy A10, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot better video definition, a larger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos.
Samsung Galaxy A10 features just a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 6 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.