Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-19 | 2021-08-10 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White and Shadow Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (480 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 is way better than Galaxy A10, having a global score of 89 against 72.3. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 body has the same thickness than the Galaxy A10, but it is much heavier. Both phones in this comparison review use the same Android 11 operating system, so they should provide all the same operating system features.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has a better performing processor than Galaxy A10, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has a much better display than Galaxy A10, because it has a little larger display, a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and more pixels per inch in the display.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has a way better camera than Galaxy A10, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 also has a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality, a much higher video definition and a back facing camera with a way higher 108 megapixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 counts with a slightly better memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A10, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.