Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-19 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is much better than Galaxy A10, getting an 81.1 score against 72.3. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's construction is newer than the Galaxy A10's, but it's somewhat heavier and thicker. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version and Galaxy A10 has Android 11.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much better display than Galaxy A10, because it has a little bigger screen, a much higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a greater display density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A10, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A10, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality, a much higher video quality and a lot better 64 MP resolution camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A10, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a 48% bigger battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A10, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.