Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.4 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.0 |
| 2019-07-12 | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 125.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S III Cricket is a little bit better than Galaxy A10e, getting a 71.5 score against 71.4. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S III Cricket has the older 4.0 version while Galaxy A10e has Android 11 version. Galaxy S III Cricket is a a little lighter but a little thicker phone than Galaxy A10e.
Galaxy A10e has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, and they both have a 2 GB RAM, the Galaxy A10e also counts with a larger number of cores (and they are faster). Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A10e, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1280 x 720 and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixels quantity per inch of screen.
The Galaxy S III Cricket and Galaxy A10e count with really similar cameras, and although the Galaxy S III Cricket has a lot tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photos, they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, a same resolution back camera and the same 30 fps video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy A10e has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A10e also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A10e counts with a way better battery performance than Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a 43% greater battery size.
The Galaxy S III Cricket is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.