Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 |
| 2019-07-12 | 2013-03-14 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Polycarbonate |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 125.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 17 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S4 has an overall score of 76.1, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A10e's 71.4 overall score. The Galaxy S4 body is just a little lighter and a bit thinner than the Galaxy A10e, even though it was released many years before. Both phones we compare here include Android operating system, but Galaxy S4 has newer 4.4.2 version and Galaxy A10e has Android 11, so it counts with a couple nice extra features and increased performance.
Galaxy S4 has an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy A10e, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1920 x 1080px. Galaxy A10e counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S4, because it has 16 GB more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy S4 has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A10e, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy S4 also counts with an additional GPU. The Galaxy S4 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10e, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy S4 also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A10e counts with a bit better battery life than Galaxy S4, because it has a 3000mAh battery size instead of 2600mAh.
The Galaxy S4 costs a little more than the Galaxy A10e, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.