Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-07-12 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 125.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 is much better than the Galaxy A10e, getting a score of 79.5 against 71.4. The Samsung Galaxy S7 is a incredibly older and just a bit heavier phone than the Galaxy A10e, but Samsung was able to make it a little bit thinner anyway. Galaxy S7 has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A10e, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy S7 counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A10e, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a much higher pixels number per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy A10e has a better storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A10e also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy S7 has a battery duration that is just as good as the Galaxy A10e one. Galaxy S7 takes better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10e, because it has a lot better 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos in low light environments and a way better 3840x2160 video quality.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy S7 is also cheaper than the Galaxy A10e, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.