Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-27 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than Galaxy A10s's 73.8 score. The Apple iPhone X is an older and a bit heavier phone than the Galaxy A10s, but Apple made it just a little thinner anyway. The iPhone X has a superior performance than Galaxy A10s, because although it has less cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processor and a higher amount of RAM.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher pixels amount per inch of display and a way higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels. The Apple iPhone X features a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A10s, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A10s counts with a superior battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The iPhone X counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a worse 12 mega pixels resolution camera, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the iPhone X also counts with a lot higher (4K) video quality.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A10s. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone X, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A10s, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.