Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-27 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is better than the Galaxy A10s, with an 82 score against 73.8. Apple iPhone XR's body is older, heavier and a bit thicker than Galaxy A10s. The iPhone XR features a much better screen than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixels density and a quite better 828 x 1792px resolution.
The iPhone XR features a greater performance than Galaxy A10s, because although it has 2 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with more RAM memory and a 64 bits processing unit. The Apple iPhone XR shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a lower 12 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a same size aperture, the Apple iPhone XR also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video quality.
The Galaxy A10s has a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than iPhone XR, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A10s has improved battery duration than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 36 percent larger battery size.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A10s. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy A10s, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.