Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-27 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a general score of 80.2, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A10s's general score of 73.8. Google Pixel is a noticeably older and just a little thicker cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A10s, but Google was able to build it somewhat lighter anyway. Google Pixel counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher screen pixels density and a better 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution.
Galaxy A10s counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with 4 more cpu cores. The Google Pixel features just a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A10s features a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2770mAh. The Google Pixel takes a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 12.3 mega pixels resolution and a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a much better video resolution.
The Google Pixel is way more expensive than the Galaxy A10s, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.