Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-27 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than Galaxy A10s, with a global score of 80 against 73.8. The Google Pixel 3 is a lighter phone than the Galaxy A10s, but both are 0.31inches thick. Google Pixel 3 features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 3 has a sharper display than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a much greater screen density. Google Pixel 3 has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser MP, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 3 also counts with a much better video definition.
Galaxy A10s has much more storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A10s features a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3 is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.