Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-27 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, getting a overall score of 80.7 against 73.8. The Google Pixel 3 XL is a a little bit heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, but they are 0.31inches thick. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a quite larger screen, a much better resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a much higher screen density.
Galaxy A10s features a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Google Pixel 3 XL has a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A10s has just a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel 3 XL captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse resolution, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Google Pixel 3 XL also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 3 XL is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.