Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-27 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has a general score of 78.8, which is slightly better than Galaxy A10s's general score of 73.8. Although Google Pixel 3a and Galaxy A10s were released only a couple of months apart, Google Pixel 3a's body is a little bit thicker but also lighter. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should provide the user very similar OS features.
The Google Pixel 3a features a more vivid display than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2220px and a way higher quantity of pixels per display inch. Google Pixel 3a has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 3a also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3a shoots clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a back camera with a worse 12.2 mega pixels resolution, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Google Pixel 3a also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition. The Galaxy A10s features a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A10s features improved battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Google Pixel 3a not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.