Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-08-27 | 2016-03-31 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| $ 202.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 554 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G5 is just a bit better than the Galaxy A10s, getting a global score of 76.1 against 73.8. Both phones we are comparing work with Android operating system, but LG G5 has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy A10s has Android 11 version. LG G5's body is just a bit lighter and a little bit thinner than Galaxy A10s, although it was released 3 years before.
The LG G5 counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a lot more pixels per inch in the screen. The LG G5 counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal storage, the LG G5 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G5's processor is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A10s one, because although the LG G5 has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A10s features a much better battery duration than LG G5, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The LG G5 features a superior camera than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a same size aperture, the LG G5 also has a better resolution camera in the back and a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
Although LG G5 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A10s. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the LG G5, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A10s, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.