Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-08-27 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 Fit is just a bit better than Galaxy A10s, with a 77 score against 73.8. LG G7 Fit's body has the same thickness than Galaxy A10s, but it's just a little lighter. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the LG G7 Fit has the newer 8.1 Oreo version and Galaxy A10s has Android 11 version, providing a lot of extra features.
Galaxy A10s has a bit better performance than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores. LG G7 Fit counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a lot higher display pixels density.
The LG G7 Fit takes clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a camera with more mega-pixels and a much better (4K) video resolution. LG G7 Fit counts with a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG G7 Fit also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A10s has better battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.