Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-27 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has an overall score of 82.7, which is much better than Galaxy A10s's 73.8 general score. Both phones in this review have Android OS (operating system), but the LG G8X ThinQ has the older 10 version and Galaxy A10s has Android 11 version. LG G8X ThinQ is a heavier and just a little bit thicker phone than Galaxy A10s.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a brighter display than Galaxy A10s, because it has a greater pixel amount in each inch of screen, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little larger display. LG G8X ThinQ has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a lower resolution back facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with a lot higher video quality. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A10s, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a battery performance that is just as good as the Galaxy A10s one.
LG G8X ThinQ is a bit more expensive than Galaxy A10s, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.