Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A10s, having a overall score of 78.6 against 73.8. LG V10's construction is extremely older, somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy A10s. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the LG V10 has an older 5.1 version and Samsung Galaxy A10s has Android 11.
LG V10 counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a lot better display density. The LG V10 has a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has 64 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A10s features a bit faster processor than LG V10, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with 7 more processing cores. The LG V10 takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the LG V10 also has a lot better video quality and a more MP camera in the back.
The Galaxy A10s features greater battery life than LG V10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
LG V10 is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A10s, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.