Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-08-27 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is better than Galaxy A10s's global score of 73.8. The LG V30S ThinQ is an older cellphone than Galaxy A10s, but LG managed to build it just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy A10s has Android 11 version.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM. The LG V30S ThinQ has a way better looking display than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a way higher count of pixels per screen inch.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a much bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A10s features improved battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
LG V30S ThinQ takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A10s, because it has a bigger aperture, a camera with a higher 16 mega pixels resolution and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A10s. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A10s, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.