Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is much better than the Galaxy A10s, getting a global score of 81.2 against 73.8. Despite of the fact LG V40 ThinQ is older and just a little heavier than Galaxy A10s, it's construction is still a bit thinner. Both devices in this review include Android OS, but the LG V40 ThinQ has 10 version while Galaxy A10s has Android 11 version.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. LG V40 ThinQ has a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120, a bit bigger screen and a way higher number of pixels per screen inch.
The LG V40 ThinQ has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A10s, because it has 32 GB more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ captures better photos and videos than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a way better (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A10s features superior battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The LG V40 ThinQ costs a bit more than the Galaxy A10s, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.