Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, having a overall score of 83.4 against 73.8. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro body is notably newer than Samsung Galaxy A10s's, although it's a little bit thicker and heavier. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a more recent 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A10s has Android 11.
The Galaxy A10s counts with a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a bit larger display and a greater display pixel density.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A10s, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a much higher video quality and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A10s, because it has a 15% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.