Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a global score of 86.3, which is much better than the Galaxy A10s's score of 73.8. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has the newer 14 version and Galaxy A10s has Android 11 version, providing the user lots of additional features and performance enhancements. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a newer cellphone than the Galaxy A10s, although it's a bit heavier and a little bit thicker.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a little larger screen, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and more pixels per screen inch. Galaxy A10s counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro captures a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a lot better (4K) video definition, a camera in the back with a much higher 50 MP resolution and a way larger aperture to capture better low-light images and video. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A10s, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A10s, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.