Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-08-27 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto Z Force has a score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A10s's 73.8 overall score. Moto Z Force is an way older device than Samsung Galaxy A10s, but Motorola was able to make it just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner anyway. These devices include Android OS, but the Moto Z Force has a more recent 7.0 Nougat version while Samsung Galaxy A10s has Android 11 version, giving you some nice extra features and a performance increase.
The Moto Z Force and Samsung Galaxy A10s feature similar CPUs, because although the Moto Z Force has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with more RAM memory. Moto Z Force counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater screen pixel density and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a lot better 21 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a way higher (4K) video quality. The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A10s counts with a little longer battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has a 14 percent greater battery size.
Although Moto Z Force is a better device, it costs more money than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A10s. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Samsung Galaxy A10s, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.