Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-27 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z2 Play has a general score of 77.4, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A10s's 73.8 overall score. The Moto Z2 Play design is much thinner and somewhat lighter than the Galaxy A10s, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a greater display pixel density.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has more RAM memory. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play takes a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a back camera with a lower 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition and a bigger camera aperture.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A10s has superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Moto Z2 Play is also cheap compared to the Samsung Galaxy A10s, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.