Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-27 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Blue and Brown |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, with an 80.7 score against 73.8. Despite being the best device in this review, it must be noted that it is also a a little heavier and a bit thicker device. Motorola One Vision has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a little bigger display, a much better count of pixels per display inch and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2520px.
Motorola One Vision has a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Motorola One Vision also has 128 GB internal memory. The Motorola One Vision features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola One Vision also has more RAM.
Galaxy A10s features a bit better battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 14% greater battery capacity. The Motorola One Vision shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A10s, because it has a back camera with lot more MP, a bigger aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited situations and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.