Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 15 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | -- |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 271 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a general score of 79.2, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A10s's overall score of 73.8. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a incredibly newer and extremely thinner cellphone than Galaxy A10s, although it's also heavier. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has the newer 15 version while Galaxy A10s has Android 11 version.
Galaxy A10s has a much more vibrant display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller screen. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A10s, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Galaxy A10s counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a back camera with a lot higher resolution and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.