Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 is just a bit better than the Galaxy A10s, having a global score of 80.8 against 73.8. Nokia XR20's body is newer than the Galaxy A10s's, although it's notably thicker and heavier. These phones include the same Android 11 operating system, so they should give you identical OS features.
The Nokia XR20 has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a higher pixels count per display inch. The Nokia XR20 features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Nokia XR20 also has more internal storage.
Nokia XR20 features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have 8 cores, the Nokia XR20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Nokia XR20 takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and a same size diafragm aperture, the Nokia XR20 also has a lot more MP camera in the back and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
The Nokia XR20 has a little longer battery duration than Galaxy A10s, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A10s. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Nokia XR20, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A10s, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.