Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-27 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Cyber shade |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 3S is a bit better than Galaxy A10s, having a general score of 75.8 against 73.8. These devices include Android OS, but the nubia Red Magic 3S has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy A10s has Android 11. Nubia Red Magic 3S's body is thicker and incredibly heavier than Galaxy A10s.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution, a quite larger screen and a greater amount of pixels per inch of display.
Nubia Red Magic 3S takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy A10s, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a larger camera aperture and a much higher resolution camera in the back. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Although nubia Red Magic 3S is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A10s. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the nubia Red Magic 3S, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A10s, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.