Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Sonic silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 5S is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, with a score of 76.2 against 73.8. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the nubia Red Magic 5S has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A10s has Android 11 version. Although nubia Red Magic 5S is newer than Samsung Galaxy A10s, it is extremely heavier and thicker.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a little faster processor than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution, a little bigger display and a higher number of pixels per inch of display.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a much better video definition and a lot more megapixels back-facing camera. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a slightly bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a little better battery performance than Galaxy A10s, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although nubia Red Magic 5S is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A10s. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Galaxy A10s, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.