Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 is better than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, having an 81.3 score against 73.8. Although the Galaxy A31 is better than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, we must tell that it's also just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker. Both devices we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A31 has older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A10s has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy A31 features a better looking display than Galaxy A10s, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a much higher screen density and a little bit larger display. The Samsung Galaxy A31 features a greater memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also has 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A31 takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also counts with a much better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.